1 Tom Latham became the first New Zealand batsman to carry his bat through an ODI innings. Latham is only the tenth batsman in ODIs to do. This was Lathams sixth fifty-plus score, and his first against India, in his first match against them. He has scored four fifties in seven international innings in this tour so far. No other New Zealand batsman has made more than one.32 Number of fifty-plus scores by Virat Kohli while chasing in day-night ODIs - the second-highest, behind Sachin Tendulkar, who had 34 such scores from 107 innings. Kohli has scored 3801 runs at an average of 69.10 in 70 innings. In day matches, Kohli averages 40.70 while chasing, crossing fifty six times in 22 innings. This was also Kohlis 38th fifty-plus score in the 92 innings in which he has chased.5 Number of consecutive ODIs in which India had gone winless against New Zealand before this match. They lost a five-match bilateral series in New Zealand 4-0, with one match ending in a tie. At home, however, this is Indias seventh straight ODI win against New Zealand. Their last loss had come in Cuttack in 2003.1 Number of batsmen to have got their maiden fifty-plus score in their 100th ODI before Tim Southee. Incidentally, the first one to so was also a New Zealand batsman and against the same opposition: Kyle Mills had got 54 against India in in Christchurch in 2009. Southees 55 in this match is the highest by a New Zealand batsman at No. 9 or lower, and only the fifth fifty by them.3 Number of India players to have won the Man-of-the-Match award on debut before Hardik Pandya. The previous such instance came earlier this year when KL Rahul won the award for his unbeaten century against Zimbabwe. Mohit Sharma and Sandeep Patil are the others to have achieved this for India.125 Runs added by New Zealand for their last three wickets - their highest in an ODI. They had added 118 for their last three wickets against India in Vadodara in 2010-11, which was their previous highest.6 Number of lower scores at seven down from which a team has added 100 or more runs for its last hree wickets in an ODI. New Zealand were tottering at 65 for 7 in this match before adding 125 for the last three wickets. The lowest such score came in an ODI involving the same two teams, but on that occasion, India recovered from 43 for 7, only to be bowled for 164 in pursuit of 216.6 Number of lower scores at which New Zealand have lost their seventh wicket before this match. Their lowest score at seven-down was 32, against Pakistan in Sharjah in 1986. They were eventually bowled out for 64.3 Number of India bowlers to have taken fewer matches to complete 50 ODI wickets than Amit Mishra. Mishra, who was playing his 32nd ODI, is the quickest India spinner to the landmark, beating R Ashwin, who took 34 matches. Ajit Agarkar (23 ODIs), Mohammad Shami (29) and Irfan Pathan (31) are the bowlers to have taken fewer ODIs than Mishra.3 Number of India bowlers to have returned better figures on debut than Hardik Pandyas 3 for 31 in this match. Noel David took 3 for 21 against West Indies in 1997, which are the best. Varun Aaron, who took 3 for 24 against England in 2011-12, and Subroto Bannerjee, who claimed 3 for 30 against West Indies in Perth in 1991-92, are the others ahead of Pandya.Cheap Vapormax Shoes .com) - The Montreal Canadiens embark on their first road trip of the season as they head out west to battle the Calgary Flames on Wednesday night. Cheap Vapormax China . -- Jimmie Johnson held off a teammate, passed a pair of Hall of Famers, and dominated once more at Dover. http://www.vapormaxcheap.us/ . He said Tuesday thats a big reason why he is now the new coach of the Tennessee Titans. Whisenhunt said he hit it off quickly with Ruston Webster when interviewing for the job Friday night. Wholesale Air Max ., for the next three years with the signings on Monday of Daryl Townsend and Michael Carter. Clearance Vapormax Free Shipping . -- Kyrie Irvings last-minute 3-pointer helped seal another victory for Cleveland -- and the Cavaliers longest winning streak since LeBron James left.Batsmen get punked in the subcontinent. Big time. England, for example, spent the best part of two days watching India pile on the runs but when it was their turn, the ball began keeping low, it started turning. It caused problems even when it did nothing and went straight.Indias total of 455 seemed like a garish example of excess. Picture a solid gold super car. So why get stingy with the close catchers? Ajinkya Rahane at slip was a constant. So was a short leg. Occasionally there was a gully or a leg slip. The rest were protecting singles and boundaries.Consider the five wickets that India took in Visakhapatnam. Alastair Cook was conned by Mohammed Shami. The proud seam of a brand new SG ball was pointing towards the left of the keeper. It should have moved away. It did not. It came in off the pitch and broke the off stump in two. Englands captain would be within his rights to find the nearest coaching manual and yell, you filthy little liar. Haseeb Hameed was run-out. Ben Duckett wrapped himself up with a neat little bow for R Ashwin. Joe Root played a bad shot. And Moeen Ali was done in by less spin than he expected.All but one of those bear the mark of batsmen making mistakes and they happened because India did not give away easy runs. Only 14 balls out of Ashwins 13 overs were scored off. If thats put down to his experience and ranking as the Worlds No. 1 bowler, what explains Jayant Yadav allowing England to profit from only seven of his balls in seven overs? He is a Test debutant.Tactics, perhaps? The men India had saving singles were alert, and well placed. The bowlers were accurate enough to make the job a bit easier. And without the rotation of strike, the pressure on a batsman can seem starker than it is. Even to someone batting past a half-century, as it turned out.Roots down-the-track mow into the leg side that ended up caught off a leading edge looked quite awful. But India allowed him only nine runs in 33 balls since his mix-up with Hameed led England off course. There were other close calls as well, including an offbreak that breached his bat-pad gap. India sensed something. They brought mid-on up, and had Umesh Yadav, a goodd athlete and a fine catcher, about 20 yards from the mid-off boundary.dddddddddddd Upon seeing the miscue, he backtracked smoothly to his left and did the needful.Ashwin, the bowler, punched the air and let out a roar. He doesnt usually celebrate like that - unless it was the culmination of a plan. Its a very very different pitch to what we saw in Rajkot. Its not one of those easy-paced wickets, he said at the post-match press conference. He [Root] jabbed at one, one went through the gate. and he nicked one, almost, to short leg. So we were expecting a shot like that, and thats why we put the mid-on.It wasnt the first time Root had been starved out either. Misbah-ul-Haq had done him the same way at Lords earlier this summer.Still, where was the harm to have a few more men catching? At least, it would show the batsman who was on top. Yes, but what if Virat Kohli thought it might show something else as well? Gaps, which could be exploited to release the pressure he wanted built. Runs which would mean his spinners cannot get their rhythm right. And a momentum shift with England having a considerably long batting line-up. So, instead, he forced the opposition to take sizeable risks for singles and twos.The ploy isnt foolproof. It may not have yielded such dramatic results either had a few of the visiting batsmen shown a bit more patience. But there was a certain merit to it. Close-in fielders are most useful when the pitch is turning alarmingly and affording extra bounce. In such cases, a captain cant quite decide where inside and outside edges would go so he has to cover his bases. Things havent quite reached that stage yet in Visakhapatnam. Ashwin was beating right-handers with drift more often than he did with turn. Besides, isnt cricket notorious for fielders being put into places after edges fly through them? Not much of that happened here. Natural variation and the ball keeping low were the major problems and by tying a batsman down at one end, India made them play on Englands mind and seem considerably larger. ' ' '